No further comment doesn't mean im working with anyone. It just means information is being withheld.Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:21:00 pmNo further comment... alright i'll ask someone who spills. Christina, is this Matt's way of saying he's working with Patrick/Cole/Simone/Kim now? Is that a viable option for him and how does that make you feel?Matt wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:17:48 pmI do think a little bit has changed. They've definitely started talking to me more (as in Pat/Cole/Simone/Kim)Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:15:31 pmMatt, you were with Christina last round calling out Patrick/Cole/Simone/Kim has that changed this round?
No further comment
@Christina Well I would like some receipts because nowhere did I say I was "hurt"Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:16:34 pmKim, in the last challenge you were voted the Most likely to win the game and biggest strategic threat. With Christina safe tonight does that give you concern?Kim wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:15:04 pmLol girl I specifically said you gotta do what you gotta do for your game and I get it (aka how is that being upset with you?) And yes I don't want to work with you because if you make it to the end of this game, no one else even has a chance. You've got my vote that's for sure :)
Christina, are you worried that the jury is making you a bigger target?Patrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:20 pmalso i think (unless the jury is playing 4d chess) they are making xtina more of a target then they realise lol i mean all of em liking her winning post haha like its easy to make up our minds for us who the most dangerous person is and who will get votes at the end
Patrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:20 pmalso i think (unless the jury is playing 4d chess) they are making xtina more of a target then they realise lol i mean all of em liking her winning post haha like its easy to make up our minds for us who the most dangerous person is and who will get votes at the end
Kim wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:31 pm@Christina Well I would like some receipts because nowhere did I say I was "hurt"Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:16:34 pmKim, in the last challenge you were voted the Most likely to win the game and biggest strategic threat. With Christina safe tonight does that give you concern?Kim wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:15:04 pmLol girl I specifically said you gotta do what you gotta do for your game and I get it (aka how is that being upset with you?) And yes I don't want to work with you because if you make it to the end of this game, no one else even has a chance. You've got my vote that's for sure :)
@Jeff Yes I'm probably going to join the jury tonight because apparently I'm some big strategic threat that is telling everyone what to do and I need to be stopped. Perception is reality in this game so apparently by everyone's perception it's obvious to vote me out. However, if perception is reality, there's a lot of people still here who are just sitting and voting what people tell them to and they will not be rewarded when the jury votes. But I'm glad voting me is some big move these people can put on their resume
Patrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:20 pmalso i think (unless the jury is playing 4d chess) they are making xtina more of a target then they realise lol i mean all of em liking her winning post haha like its easy to make up our minds for us who the most dangerous person is and who will get votes at the end
Julie wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:23:31 pmPatrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:20 pmalso i think (unless the jury is playing 4d chess) they are making xtina more of a target then they realise lol i mean all of em liking her winning post haha like its easy to make up our minds for us who the most dangerous person is and who will get votes at the end
I think we saw a bit of this during the challenge. They are talking to him, and giving him shit. It is not a viable option for him. If he works with them, he becomes the same as others' in this game: a pawn for them to use.Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:21:00 pmNo further comment... alright i'll ask someone who spills. Christina, is this Matt's way of saying he's working with Patrick/Cole/Simone/Kim now? Is that a viable option for him and how does that make you feel?Matt wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:17:48 pmI do think a little bit has changed. They've definitely started talking to me more (as in Pat/Cole/Simone/Kim)Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:15:31 pmMatt, you were with Christina last round calling out Patrick/Cole/Simone/Kim has that changed this round?
No further comment
Okay you said this, but then you were still against Christina who was a big threat as well. I guess I don't follow the logic of someone who is outed for being a huge threat to win wanting someone else who is also a huge threat out. Is it purely a matter of you two not getting along?Kim wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:31 pm@Christina Well I would like some receipts because nowhere did I say I was "hurt"Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:16:34 pmKim, in the last challenge you were voted the Most likely to win the game and biggest strategic threat. With Christina safe tonight does that give you concern?Kim wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:15:04 pmLol girl I specifically said you gotta do what you gotta do for your game and I get it (aka how is that being upset with you?) And yes I don't want to work with you because if you make it to the end of this game, no one else even has a chance. You've got my vote that's for sure :)
@Jeff Yes I'm probably going to join the jury tonight because apparently I'm some big strategic threat that is telling everyone what to do and I need to be stopped. Perception is reality in this game so apparently by everyone's perception it's obvious to vote me out. However, if perception is reality, there's a lot of people still here who are just sitting and voting what people tell them to and they will not be rewarded when the jury votes. But I'm glad voting me is some big move these people can put on their resume
Matt wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:21 pmNo further comment doesn't mean im working with anyone. It just means information is being withheld.Jeff Probst wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:21:00 pmNo further comment... alright i'll ask someone who spills. Christina, is this Matt's way of saying he's working with Patrick/Cole/Simone/Kim now? Is that a viable option for him and how does that make you feel?
Patrick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:22:20 pmalso i think (unless the jury is playing 4d chess) they are making xtina more of a target then they realise lol i mean all of em liking her winning post haha like its easy to make up our minds for us who the most dangerous person is and who will get votes at the end