- Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:17:49 pm
#1505
Exactly, if anyone is leftover inactives. Just feels wrong to leave them in here. It's just the thought if Bill or anyone else is considered that to people. I guess.
Jonas wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:14:25 pmI'm just sitting here taking this all in, so just kind of playing devil's advocate on this one, but I will say this, voting for an inactive isn't really strategic, you know?Cole wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:09:08 pm
you sure talk a lot of shit, since you got that immunity necklace. let's see how far that gets you. go ahead and write my name down. i trust that my allies have my back. i don't owe you an explanation why i was targeting you. i mean, if you have a HUGE target on your back, why are you so offended i was going after you if you conclude that's a logical thing for people to do...?
i think it would be more strategic for everyone to vote out someone that isn't active. i wasn't going after her because i want to keep inactive people around, she's just trying to spin things for you to vote in her favor. the lines in the sand have evidently been drawn. i hope that you guys vote for someone that isn't putting any effort into the game.
It's an easy and sensible thing, but it isn't really 'strategic' except at the basest level that it does get you one step further in the game.
To flip that on Julie, if Cole has made it personal, that is definitely wrong (and I sure hope he hasn't said things like that. If so, come on man, really?), but, you were saying you'd rather go ahead playing with people in the game who are active over inactive.
This is the last opportunity to get the merge starting as active as possible. Rivalry and anger included.