Stranded in Sri Lanka

Ali wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:21:36 pm

I am just going to vote Bill.

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:19:46 pm

Jonas wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:14:25 pm

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:09:08 pm

you sure talk a lot of shit, since you got that immunity necklace. let's see how far that gets you. go ahead and write my name down. i trust that my allies have my back. i don't owe you an explanation why i was targeting you. i mean, if you have a HUGE target on your back, why are you so offended i was going after you if you conclude that's a logical thing for people to do...?

i think it would be more strategic for everyone to vote out someone that isn't active. i wasn't going after her because i want to keep inactive people around, she's just trying to spin things for you to vote in her favor. the lines in the sand have evidently been drawn. i hope that you guys vote for someone that isn't putting any effort into the game.

I'm just sitting here taking this all in, so just kind of playing devil's advocate on this one, but I will say this, voting for an inactive isn't really strategic, you know?
It's an easy and sensible thing, but it isn't really 'strategic' except at the basest level that it does get you one step further in the game.


To flip that on Julie, if Cole has made it personal, that is definitely wrong (and I sure hope he hasn't said things like that. If so, come on man, really?), but, you were saying you'd rather go ahead playing with people in the game who are active over inactive.
This is the last opportunity to get the merge starting as active as possible. Rivalry and anger included.

I never said that she was stupid. No idea where she's getting that from. She's going to say whatever she can to get you on her side. She's saying I'm a woman hater, that I make fun of disabled people, and that I'm targeting inactives. I was targeting her because she's a social threat. Why is that so crazy? She is probably one of the most active people on this game. The people that know me know that I'm not like that.

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:37 pm

I'm voting Bill too.

Leif wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:37 pm

but I will say that I don't think this game needs to get personal! we're all people playing an online game for absolutely no prize. let's keep it within the context of the game.

Ali wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:25:18 pm

Leif wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:37 pm

but I will say that I don't think this game needs to get personal! we're all people playing an online game for absolutely no prize. let's keep it within the context of the game.

I agree with this.

Except, when I am voted out I will be calling you guys so many bitches and cunt* like I've lost my mind.

Julie wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:39 pm

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:19:46 pm

Jonas wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:14:25 pm

I'm just sitting here taking this all in, so just kind of playing devil's advocate on this one, but I will say this, voting for an inactive isn't really strategic, you know?
It's an easy and sensible thing, but it isn't really 'strategic' except at the basest level that it does get you one step further in the game.


To flip that on Julie, if Cole has made it personal, that is definitely wrong (and I sure hope he hasn't said things like that. If so, come on man, really?), but, you were saying you'd rather go ahead playing with people in the game who are active over inactive.
This is the last opportunity to get the merge starting as active as possible. Rivalry and anger included.

I never said that she was stupid. No idea where she's getting that from. She's going to say whatever she can to get you on her side. She's saying I'm a woman hater, that I make fun of disabled people, and that I'm targeting inactives. I was targeting her because she's a social threat. Why is that so crazy? She is probably one of the most active people on this game. The people that know me know that I'm not like that.

I've been told that you said I was so stupid and that you can't wait to vote me out. Also, you have been targeting active people instead of inactive people. We all wanted Michael out but you kept trying to flip everyone on me.

Leif wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:37 pm

but I will say that I don't think this game needs to get personal! we're all people playing an online game for absolutely no prize. let's keep it within the context of the game.

Julie wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:39 pm

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:19:46 pm

Jonas wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:14:25 pm

I'm just sitting here taking this all in, so just kind of playing devil's advocate on this one, but I will say this, voting for an inactive isn't really strategic, you know?
It's an easy and sensible thing, but it isn't really 'strategic' except at the basest level that it does get you one step further in the game.


To flip that on Julie, if Cole has made it personal, that is definitely wrong (and I sure hope he hasn't said things like that. If so, come on man, really?), but, you were saying you'd rather go ahead playing with people in the game who are active over inactive.
This is the last opportunity to get the merge starting as active as possible. Rivalry and anger included.

I never said that she was stupid. No idea where she's getting that from. She's going to say whatever she can to get you on her side. She's saying I'm a woman hater, that I make fun of disabled people, and that I'm targeting inactives. I was targeting her because she's a social threat. Why is that so crazy? She is probably one of the most active people on this game. The people that know me know that I'm not like that.

I've been told that you said I was so stupid and that you can't wait to vote me out. Also, you have been targeting active people instead of inactive people. We all wanted Michael out but you kept trying to flip everyone on me.

Matt wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:26:29 pm

jeffery where we vote, just in confessionals?

Ali wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:25:18 pm

Leif wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:37 pm

but I will say that I don't think this game needs to get personal! we're all people playing an online game for absolutely no prize. let's keep it within the context of the game.

I agree with this.

Except, when I am voted out I will be calling you guys so many bitches and cunt* like I've lost my mind.

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:26:30 pm

Julie wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:22:39 pm

Cole wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:19:46 pm

I never said that she was stupid. No idea where she's getting that from. She's going to say whatever she can to get you on her side. She's saying I'm a woman hater, that I make fun of disabled people, and that I'm targeting inactives. I was targeting her because she's a social threat. Why is that so crazy? She is probably one of the most active people on this game. The people that know me know that I'm not like that.

I've been told that you said I was so stupid and that you can't wait to vote me out. Also, you have been targeting active people instead of inactive people. We all wanted Michael out but you kept trying to flip everyone on me.

That's funny, because every single vote I've made has been towards an inactive person. I don't know who told you what, but it isn't true. I never said you were stupid. I did express frustrations to someone that you tried to twist my words around when I said that Michael was an easy vote, and you tried to tell me I said that Jonas was. I also found it suspicious how you brought my name up to Patrick that you wanted to vote me out. So I was under the impression that you were targeting me before the thought even crossed my mind to vote for you. I thought that it was a freudian slip when you said my name accidentally to Patrick.